« Nussbaum sobre os direitos dos animais | Entrada | Históricas timidezes... »

março 21, 2006

Auberon Waugh sobre os direitos dos animais

Waugh.jpgWhat are the rights of cockroaches?

Journalists who for one reason or another wish to outlaw country recreations have developed the habit of referring to the Countryside Alliance, the body which acts as spokesman for country dwellers, as being "very rich". In fact the Alliance is a church mouse compared to the roaring lions of the opposition. One such organisation alone - the International Federation for Animal Welfare or IFAW - has been credited with receiving $200 million of American money, and I have not seen the figure contradicted. We may wonder how they manage to spend the cash pouring in from American animal sentimentalists in order to prevent English country folk from doing what they want to do.Journalists are not all that expensive.
This week we learnt how the IFAW movement is expanding. In addition to buying journalists, they have started investing in academics, to form the Universities Federation for Animal Welfare (UFAW). Next we will have the Engineers Federation for Animal Welfare (EFAW), the Obstetricians Federation (OFAW) the Car Dealers (CARDFAW). There need be no end to it. Perhaps the whole world could be turned into an organisation for animal welfare, but where would they go after that?
The Universities Federation has shown a way. At a symposium held at the Zoological Society, speaker after speaker argued that insects should be treated as if they were animals, since they are capable of feeling pain.

"Perhaps people should think twice before reaching for the fly spray," said Dr Stephen Wickens, of UFAW. Dr "Chris" Sherwin, of the University of Bristol, described experiments in which a chimpanzee had been given an electric shock in its hand ,and had pulled its hand away,thereby showing its great intelligence. But cockroaches, slugs and snails - none of which are protected by anti-cruelty legislation - reacted in the same way. Obviously they did not pull their hands away, having none to pull, but he claims they showed a similar reaction:
"Slugs will perform in some of these tests the same way as dogs, chimps and cats. They show far more complex patterns of behaviour than we had thought. And if they do feel pain, isn't that a welfare issue?"
It may not be easy to know exactly what Dr Sherwin means by a welfare issue, but the suggestion is plainly that we should consider legislation making it a criminal offence to cause suffering among slugs, snails, cockroaches and flies. Nobody mentions worms, so cruelly cut in half whenever anybody puts a spade into the ground. We have always been assured that they feel nothing. Is this scientifically correct? If not, where do we go from there, in an age which is so concerned about pain?
A later speaker at the UFAW conference, Dr Keith Kendrick, of the Babraham Institute in Cambridge, raised the stakes even higher by insisting that sheep have many human qualities: The way they recognise faces and the way they process face images is very similar to the way we do it . . . animals like sheep are doing things, as far as the brain is concerned, that are so similar to us it does imply that they are capable of some level of consciousness."
Does this mean that we should treat ovine life as if it were human? Fortunately, Dr Kendrick admitted that he occasionally ate lamb, despite his findings. This seems to put the discovery that cockroaches feel pain into perspective. Like many insects, cockroaches are a nuisance. They are greedy and dirty and widely credited with spreading disease, although I am not sure exactly what diseases they spread. Perhaps they experience pain when they are squashed, swept up and put in the dustbin but most people will harden themselves to the fact and decide they simply do not care.
Cockroaches may fulfil an important role in reducing our present obsession with animals to absurdity. Not even. New Labour will quite dare pass a law forbidding People to kill cockroaches in their own homes. There used to be a song many years ago which remonstrated with people who ate Brussels sprouts on the grounds that they were robbing a cabbage of its young, and reminded us that every lettuce has a heart. It was satirically intended, of course, but the sad truth is that the animal welfare industry, with its millions of dollars from American sentimentalists, is a formidable power in the land. As soon as it has stopped people from hunting, shooting and fishing it will move to protecting caterpillars in our gardens.
Its chief officer in this country would appear to be a large young man called Neil Hansen. From a conventional, middle class background, he is now a full-time activist living on welfare, and foolishly allows himself to be photographed in the newspapers, usually demonstrating outside someone's home. He seems to embody the great animal movement. I wish him no particular harm, but I must confess to a fantasy, that if ever I find myself in the unpleasant situation of having to squash a cockroach, I shall shut my eyes and imagine that it is Neil Hansen under my shoe. I hope it does not hurt too much.
The Sunday Telegraph May 14 2000

Publicado por Conta Natura às março 21, 2006 11:08 PM

Comentário




Recordar-me?